05-28-2016, 01:01 PM
(05-27-2016, 11:28 AM)shamrock Wrote:(05-26-2016, 11:24 PM)Infern0 Wrote:Inferno I can agree about Wilder being a bum if he didn't have ridiculous ko power, but, he does have that power. You go on to say 50/50 in some of those you listed and if' for the others.... then you say positively, if he fought the 4 he'd get 2 wins... sorry mate, that's not very convincing. It just indicates to me that Jo struggles in the top heavyweight division. Sad but true.(05-26-2016, 10:31 PM)Nigs Wrote: Sham, who in that top 10 would jo beat is my question. Do you see him beating haye, povetkin, Ortiz? Etc? I don't see him beating anyone in that top 10.
I think he is 50/50 against Wilder. Wilder was in wars with Szpilka, Molina and Duhaupas and Parker is better than all of them. If Wilder didn't have ridiculous ko p he'd be a bum, as it is I still think he's waiting to be exposed.
He could possibly beat Pulev if he moves all night and learns how to use his jab properly
Same as above for Stiverne
Jennings is 50/50 imo in what would be a boring fight.
So yeah, if he fought the 4 above he'd win at least 2 imo
I agree with inferno, i think Jo beats jenning and Stiverne. Wilder like Jo is actually getting better every fight, with his hight, improving jab and athletic ability he will be a huge force in two years time, he already is with his power. Jo has time on his side and does belong in the top 10. I beleive Takam would beat Jennings and Takam vs Stiveren Is a 50/50.