05-23-2016, 01:18 PM
There seems to be confusion about what determines #1 mandatory in the IBF....
Eddie Hearn quoted that the Takam vs Parker winning is mandatory to AJ
NZ media is all quoting the same...
Yet: http://www.badlefthook.com/2016/5/21/11728594/parker-vs-takam-results-joseph-parker-wins-decision-gets-closer-to-ibf-shot
Parker is now the No. 1 rated IBF contender, with Kubrat Pulev recently beating Dereck Chisora to claim the No. 2 spot. The sanctioning body will likely soon order a fight between Parker and Pulev for the mandatory challenger position.
Eddie Hearn quoted that the Takam vs Parker winning is mandatory to AJ
NZ media is all quoting the same...
Yet: http://www.badlefthook.com/2016/5/21/11728594/parker-vs-takam-results-joseph-parker-wins-decision-gets-closer-to-ibf-shot
Parker is now the No. 1 rated IBF contender, with Kubrat Pulev recently beating Dereck Chisora to claim the No. 2 spot. The sanctioning body will likely soon order a fight between Parker and Pulev for the mandatory challenger position.