Joseph Parker - Printable Version +- NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz) +-- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Joseph Parker (/showthread.php?tid=52) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Joseph Parker - craigyid14 - 06-02-2016 I gotta be up for work in 3 odd hours and thinking about this is keeping me awake. How's this for a scenario? Parker beat Takam to become no 1 contender, but as Joshua's aloud to take voluntaries he could in fact fight Takam next as Takam wouldn't have fallen out of the top 15. Boxing really is shit sometimes. I really gotta get some sleep, haha. RE: Joseph Parker - tm7 - 06-02-2016 (06-02-2016, 03:40 AM)craigyid14 Wrote: Surely its 9 months after you win the title you have to face your mandatory, Parkers team must have some say. Na when you win it is irrelevant, that's why Tyson Fury had it stripped one week after he won it, because he wasn't fighting his mandatory next (Glazkov) or a unification (Wilder). Instead choosing to fight Klitschko again. I don't see why he can't fight early November then mid-late January. That is in line with both of their schedules of every few months. Both are very active. And he could fight Takam if he stays in the rankings as a voluntary, but he won't as coming off a loss it won't make money. Business first, sport second. RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 06-02-2016 AJ wouldn't fight someone that Parker beat (Takam). I like that he's fighting Breazeale, and undefeated fighter. Get rid of the rif raff like Klit used to do. I just think there's huge money in Fury or Wilder; with Parker not as much. That's why I think he'll try to unify. $$$. RE: Joseph Parker - shamrock - 06-02-2016 Die, so you're really convinced Fury is gunna beat Wlad in the rematch!?? RE: Joseph Parker - NakiFan - 06-02-2016 I don't read too much into Compubox stats, but the Parker v Takam fight was viewed by some as a very tight decision even though the 116 vs 112 scorecards came back a little further apart. Here is the Compubox stats below... What is interesting is Round 8, which was one of the best rounds I've seen in awhile in the HW division. RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 06-02-2016 (06-02-2016, 12:08 PM)shamrock Wrote: Die, so you're really convinced Fury is gunna beat Wlad in the rematch!?? No Sham, the other way around. Wlad will KO Fury. Guess it was a contradiction to post that AJ vs Fury may unify. Guess it's because I don't know what Klit will do if he wins. Hopefully retire, or really mess things up time wise with a third rubber match with Fury. No way Klit and AJ ever fight each other. If Klit decides not to throw punches again, and Fury wins, I just see more $$$ with Wilder, AJ, Fury, and Haye fighting each other than any of those 4 fighting Parker. I see Parker being left out in the cold as they unify. RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 06-02-2016 (06-02-2016, 12:49 PM)NakiFan Wrote: I don't read too much into Compubox stats, but the Parker v Takam fight was viewed by some as a very tight decision even though the 116 vs 112 scorecards came back a little further apart. Here is the Compubox stats below... It's what I thought. Parker was just more active. The landed punches weren't much different, but Parker led in missed punches! Sounds bad, but he was throwing, Takam wasn't. RE: Joseph Parker - shamrock - 06-02-2016 Even though I believe Haye a danger point for some of them hasn't he got to qualify to mandatory to make it worthwhile...? Or just a lucrative interim bout? RE: Joseph Parker - diehard - 06-02-2016 Well, after there's a unification fight, then the champ is free to fight whoever they want, and Haye would be one of the big moneymakers. There's a reason Lonergan and Parker want to move to the UK to fight. $$$ Mrs D said we could go see Parker fight for the title, but not in the UK winter. I'll need to talk to Mr Higgins about when he schedules it, if it happens. Maybe KB will do a tour like he did for Tua vs LL. Sham, maybe you and I can sit together on the plane and argue for 24 hours! And then I can explain to you why Parker KO'd AJ for 24 hours on the way back! Now that's a buicket list tick. RE: Joseph Parker - NakiFan - 06-02-2016 (06-02-2016, 12:58 PM)diehard Wrote:(06-02-2016, 12:49 PM)NakiFan Wrote: I don't read too much into Compubox stats, but the Parker v Takam fight was viewed by some as a very tight decision even though the 116 vs 112 scorecards came back a little further apart. Here is the Compubox stats below... 273 jabs for Parker vs 109. That kind of misleads the uneducated saying that his jab wasn't good. But when he was throwing it he keep Takam back, opening him up and letting Parker record a 39.1% power punch landed percentage. When Joe opened up with his power in round 4-5 and 8 all those shots were over 43% landed and in round 4, 57% landed. OK, I like stats. |