Heavyweight Division - Printable Version +- NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz) +-- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: NZBoxChat (https://nzboxchat.co.nz/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: Heavyweight Division (/showthread.php?tid=21) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
|
RE: Heavyweight Division - Westywarrior - 10-18-2017 Takam will be the best opponent on AJs resume outside of an over the hill Klitschko. AJ isn’t taking this fight as lightly as some of his arrogant fanboys, he’s showing Takam respect and is ready for this to go the distance. That’s what I like about AJ , he gives respect where it’s due RE: Heavyweight Division - Beefstew - 10-18-2017 (10-18-2017, 03:59 PM)Msreef Wrote: Takam has had a full camp in prep for AJ. Who has he been sparring? I dont believe everything Hearn says. RE: Heavyweight Division - craigyid14 - 10-18-2017 It probably would of been a good fight for Joshua 2 years ago, but what does it prove now? The guy looked lazy against Parker 18 months ago and since then has beaten 2 guys not in the top 100, team Parker might be happy fighting sub standard opponents for money (as is team Wilder), I just hoped for better from Joshua's mob. From Pulev to Takam, rubbish. RE: Heavyweight Division - Westywarrior - 10-18-2017 To be fair to low ball Eddie . As a late replacement opponent you couldn’t really expect much better RE: Heavyweight Division - Infern0 - 10-18-2017 (10-18-2017, 06:43 PM)craigyid14 Wrote: It probably would of been a good fight for Joshua 2 years ago, but what does it prove now? The guy looked lazy against Parker 18 months ago and since then has beaten 2 guys not in the top 100, team Parker might be happy fighting sub standard opponents for money (as is team Wilder), I just hoped for better from Joshua's mob. From Pulev to Takam, rubbish. Well when Parker beat Takam, Takam was supposedly this killer monster who everyone in the division must fear. So i see him as a decent opponent for AJ RE: Heavyweight Division - Infern0 - 10-18-2017 (10-18-2017, 09:35 AM)Nablonicasso Wrote: http://www.skysports.com/boxing/news/12183/11085499/joshua-vs-takam-anthony-joshua-admits-that-new-challenger-carlos-takam-could-ruin-his-perfect-record If he tries to do that he will go the way of Kevin Johnson RE: Heavyweight Division - Veritas - 10-18-2017 (10-18-2017, 07:33 PM)Infern0 Wrote:(10-18-2017, 06:43 PM)craigyid14 Wrote: It probably would of been a good fight for Joshua 2 years ago, but what does it prove now? The guy looked lazy against Parker 18 months ago and since then has beaten 2 guys not in the top 100, team Parker might be happy fighting sub standard opponents for money (as is team Wilder), I just hoped for better from Joshua's mob. From Pulev to Takam, rubbish. Ha! Yes, the man no one wanted to fight, avoided even.. The hype is about to exposed when AJ crushes Takam. V. RE: Heavyweight Division - U.K. Fight Fan - 10-19-2017 Takam is decent but I'd expect AJ to win inside 5 rounds. RE: Heavyweight Division - tm7 - 10-19-2017 (10-18-2017, 06:43 PM)craigyid14 Wrote: It probably would of been a good fight for Joshua 2 years ago, but what does it prove now? The guy looked lazy against Parker 18 months ago and since then has beaten 2 guys not in the top 100, team Parker might be happy fighting sub standard opponents for money (as is team Wilder), I just hoped for better from Joshua's mob. From Pulev to Takam, rubbish. It's a mandatory, AJ and Hearn had no choice otherwise forfeit the belt. Get it out of the way and deal with either the WBA mandatory or a unification. Can't blame them for that surely. RE: Heavyweight Division - craigyid14 - 10-19-2017 I don't believe for a second that AJ would of been stripped if he didn't fight Takam! Its about saving the show, I'd of been p1ssed off if I'd have bought a ticket for AJ/Pulev and got AJ/Takam..... I'm not wasting money on ppv, that's for sure. I also think whilst Joshua stays unbeaten he's bigger than any of the alphabet belts individually anyway. |